Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Rowley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Concordia, Pierse, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The plaintiffs are appellants from a judgment by *254which they recovered an undivided half of a tract of land,-and were condemned to pay for improvements put upon the land, over and above back rents, $4583. It was further ordered that no writ of possession should be issued until the plaintiff shall have paid said sum, and that a partition be made of the land between the parties. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the plaintiffs acquiesced in the judgment pronounced in the District Court.

The alleged acquiescence consists in having proceeded, in conformity with that part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PitotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. FrostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Foster & Glassell Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Flowers v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. SavantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. of St. PaulLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API