Legal Opinion

Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Savant

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1931No. 30933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

ST. PAUL, J.

Defendant granted a mortgage to plaintiff on the MeCrory plantation on which he lived for $14,000. Thereafter defendant’s wife sued him for a separation of property, and defendant made her a dation in payment of said plantation in reimbursement of her claims against him.

Plaintiff then took foreclosure proceedings against said plantation to collect its mortgage. Whilst the plantation, which consisted -of 628 acres, was under seizure and being advertised for sale, defendant’s wife intervened in the proceedings and claimed homestead rights on the plantation to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. GrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Augustin v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Milliken v. RowleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  4. Liles v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. FrostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Foster & Glassell Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Parish of Plaquemines v. BaynardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  4. Reymond v. Louisiana Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  5. Concepción Cosme v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API