Legal Opinion

Jones v. Interstate Oil Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1931No. Docket No. 7696PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHEY, J., pro tem.

This is an action for declaratory relief with respect to an oil and gas lease in the Signal Hill territory in Los Angeles County.

At the time of the execution of the lease in question no oil sand was known nor suspected to exist in that area at a greater depth than between four to five thousand feet and no oil drilling companies had had the courage at the time to make the necessarily large expenditures incident to prospecting below that level.

The lease in question was executed in February, 1923, and provided among other things: “The party of the second part (appellants)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Monarch Oil, Gas & Coal Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Colgan v. Forest Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Becker v. Submarine Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lynch v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. McKenna v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API