Legal Opinion
Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Harvey E. Mallory
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 2, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7110PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences which awarded priority of invention to junior party Mallory in Interference No. 90,-050. That interference involves an application serial No. 586,361, filed May 22, 1956 by the senior party, Swain et al., and application serial No. 591,288, filed June 14, 1956 by the junior party, Mallory. 1
The invention relates to a method of drilling oil or gas wells using an emulsion drilling fluid as set forth in the single count of the interference. That count reads:
“1. In the method of drilling through a subsurface…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Vandenberg v. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Stern v. SchroederCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Mortsell v. LaurilaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Serge A. Loukomsky v. Hans GerlichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Lazo v. TsoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973