Legal Opinion
Mortsell v. Laurila
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 4, 1962No. 6758PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Errki A. Laurila, the junior party in interference No. 88,914.
The sole issue is whether Laurila sustained his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence introduction of the conception of his invention into the United States prior to the effective filing date of Tage Emanuel Mortsell, the senior party.1
The subject matter of this interference relates to devices which separate magnetic and non-magnetic particles from a mixture of such particles.2 In view of the sole issue presented for our…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Hess v. DreyfussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Rider v. GriffithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Sherman v. HopeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Levy v. GouldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leslie C. Case v. Cpc International, Inc., and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Co-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- John D. Scott and Rachel A. Steven v. Satoshi Koyama, Yukio Homoto, and Naoki EsakaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Hsing T. Huang v. Lee C. CheneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Eugene F. Schwarzenbek and John Turkevich v. Bernard L. Evering, John R. Coley and William A. WilsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Haskell v. ColebourneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.