Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Little

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1994No. 796-93PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant’s trial ended when the trial judge sua sponte declared a mistrial over appellant’s objection. Before he could be retried, appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus claiming retrial would violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. U.S. Const., art. V. The habeas judge denied relief and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Little v. State, 853 S.W.2d 767 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993).1 We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Resendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Krause v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Labib v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API