Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 14, 2008No. 4D07-1788PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that his separate convictions on one count of grand theft of various household items and two counts of dealing in stolen property, based on the same items being pawned, violates section 812.025, Florida Statutes (2005), which provides:

Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, a single indictment or information may, under proper circumstances, charge theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct in separate counts that may be consolidated for trial, but the trier of fact may return a guilty verdict on one or the other, but not both,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Blair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Corvo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Bishop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. State v. DasherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Kiss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Blackmon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API