Legal Opinion
Bishop v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 11, 1998No. 97-01043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
718 So.2d 890 (1998)
Samuel Arthur BISHOP, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-01043.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
September 11, 1998.
Samuel Arthur Bishop, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Samuel Arthur Bishop appeals judgments and sentences for grand theft in the first degree, a first-degree felony, and dealing in stolen property, a second-degree felony. It is undisputed that both offenses arose out of one scheme or course of conduct. We affirm the judgment…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
4Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Anucinski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Drew v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Lutz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.