Legal Opinion

Blackmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 2011No. Nos. 1D10-2018, 1D10-2021PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWetherell, J.

Appellant, David Devon Blackmon, seeks review of his convictions for both petit theft and dealing in stolen property, as well as the revocation of his probation based upon the new law offenses of burglary and theft. Blackmon raises three issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion: whether the trial court committed fundamental error by convicting him of both petit theft and dealing in stolen property where the offenses involved the same property and arose from the same course of conduct. We affirm the other issues without further comment, and for the reasons that follow, we reverse…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Aversano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Croom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Anucinski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Wilkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Kablitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API