Legal Opinion

Williams v. Village of Port Chester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Westchester comity. Action by Charles H. Williams against the village of Port Chester. From an interlocutory judgment overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from a fall upon an icy sidewalk of the defendant. The defendant demurs on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the demurrer has been overruled. The defendant appeals to' this court.

The immediate question involved and argued upon this appeal is whether the complaint alleges timely notice to the village in accordance with section 16, tit. 7, of the village charter (chapter 623, Laws 1894), which provides that no action of this character can be maintained “unless the same shall be…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  5. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ortman v. OrtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Stierle v. RohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Williams v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API