Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 8, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00246Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION GEORGE HUGHES, Petitioner, Case No. 1:21-cv-246 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE Magistrate Judge Merz CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Merz’s Report and Recommendation (R&R, Doc. 22) recommending that the Court dismiss George Hughes’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(Doc. 3) with prejudice. Because the Court agrees that the sole ground for relief Hughes raises in his petition is procedurally defaulted, the Court ADOPTS the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Shinn v. Martinez RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API