Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Salem v. Bruner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. TC 139,465; CA A28085; SC S30627Published

1ConcurrenceCampbell, J.

I concur in the result reached in the court’s opinion and will state an alternative analysis on which I think the decision should be based.

At the crux of the majority opinion is the reliance on petitioner’s argument outlined in his brief that the police officer had “unbridled discretion” to determine the appeal route by checking one of two boxes on the uniform citation form indicating a violation of either a city ordinance or a state statute and designating the court in which the original trial would be held. However, at oral argument, petitioner abandoned this argument and conceded that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Schepps v. HoweWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Douglas County v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Webb v. HIGHWAY DIV. OF OREGON STATEOregon Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API