Legal Opinion

Webb v. HIGHWAY DIV. OF OREGON STATE

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1982No. CA A20056, SC 28576PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*647CAMPBELL, J.

Plaintiff brought this tort action for personal injuries following an accident between his vehicle and a truck driven by an employe of the Highway Division of the State of Oregon. Plaintiff, through his attorney, sent notice by regular mail to an employe of the Department of Justice who had authority to investigate tort claims and make settlements. The Oregon Tort Claims Act in effect at that time,1 ORS 30.275(1), required notice to be given to the Attorney General personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested. The trial court held that proper notice had not been given…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Douglas County v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Sprague v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rogers v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Robinson v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFWCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. City of Salem v. BrunerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API