Legal Opinion

Macon v. J.C. Penney Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 23, 2014No. Case No. 3:12-cv-02826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge.

I. Introduction and Background

Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCPenney”), seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Verlean Macon’s amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 35). Macon opposes. (Doc. No. 36). For the reasons stated below, I conclude Macon fails to present sufficient factual allegations to state a plausible claim for relief, and grant JCPenney’s motion to dismiss.

Macon began working as a hair stylist for JCPenney in 1986. She held several different…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jennifer Richey v. ABM Education Services, LLC, and Superintendent Mid-Del Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  2. Reichert v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API