Legal Opinion

Christopher P. Kelsay v. Deputy Tinsley Wiser, Jane Doe, Lane County, and Does 1–11

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 8, 2025No. 6:25-cv-00219Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION CHRISTOPHER P. KELSAY, Case No. 6:25-cv-00219-MC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. DEPUTY TINSLEY WISER, JANE DOE, LANE COUNTY, and DOES 1–11, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff Christopher Kelsay brings this action against Defendants Tinsley Wiser, Jane Doe, and Lane County, asserting various

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and state law claims. First Am. Compl. at 1, ECF No. 4. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defs.’…

2Cases cited36 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.