Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anchorage v. McCabe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1977No. 2737Published

1Concurrence

RABINOWITZ, Justice,

with whom ERWIN, Justice, joins concurring.

While I agree with the court’s disposition of this matter, I disagree with the court’s treatment of the “capacity to be assessed” issue. The majority reasons that since the Board of Adjustment was accorded full party status in Munroe v. City Council for City of Anchorage, 545 P.2d 165, reh’g granted and opinion modified, 547 P.2d 839 (Alaska 1976), it is capable of full party status in the instant case and has the capacity to be assessed attorney’s fees. I think it is necessary to examine those factors which set a zoning board…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Munroe v. City Council for City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Boyd & Usher Transport v. Southern Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  5. Munroe v. City Council for the City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API