Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 2011No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

¶ 1 Anthony and Leticia Jackson appeal from the trial court’s grant of Appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment and the denial of the Jacksons’ motion for new trial in this declaratory action against Nationwide and its subsidiary AMCO Insurance Company (collectively “Nationwide”). 1 The Jacksons argue the court erred in concluding that A.R.S. § 20-259.01, Arizona’s Uninsured Motorist Act (UMA), did not require Nationwide to offer uninsured motorist coverage under the Businessowner’s Policy it had provided to an automobile service and repair…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  2. Dorazio v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  3. Frank and Bettina Gambrell v. Ids Property Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Lisa A Nutt v. Nationwide Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  5. Lopez v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API