Legal Opinion

Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Sumner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1936No. 26696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, in which award said commission found that on the 31st day of March, 1933, the claimant was in the employ of the respondent and engaged in a hazardous occupation subject to and covered by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and on said date sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, the nature of which was a severe injury to the right side, arm, and shoulder, and pains radiating from the right side which affected the kidneys.

The commission found the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Carl B. King Drilling Co. v. MassenburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartlett-Collins Co. v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Williams v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. EL Mendenhall Company v. KellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Commander Mills, Inc. v. StanstillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. State Highway Commission v. BrixeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API