Legal Opinion

Carl B. King Drilling Co. v. Massenburg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1932No. 22597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

This is a proceeding in the Supreme Court to review an award of the State Industrial Commission rendered on June 30, 1931, in favor of Robert Massen-burg. The findings of fact in said award are as follows:

“(1) That, on the 17th day of January, 1931, the claimant was in the employment of said respondent and engaged in a hazardous occupation subject to and covered by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and that on said date sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, consisting of an injury to the right arm.
"(2) That the average daily wage of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donovan v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Jendrus v. Detroit Steel Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Blate v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Consolidated Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Commander Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. EL Mendenhall Company v. KellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Simmerman v. FelthauserNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Leavell Coal Co. v. StamperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API