Legal Opinion

Intermodal Technologies, Inc. v. Mineta

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 7, 2006No. 05-10204-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND SETTING CALENDAR DATES

LAWSON, District Judge.

This case represents the latest effort by William Washington to gain approval for the truck braking system he invented, the MSQR 5000®. In June 2001, the acting chief counsel for the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA) posted a letter on the agency’s website expressing the opinion that the MSQR 5000® would not meet a certain Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) pertaining to anti-lock braking systems (ABS). Washington’s company filed suit in this Court, but…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanif v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. Chesterfield Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. King v. McAleenanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Pratt v. KSE Sportsman Media, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API