Ag-Innovations, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL
SWEENEY, Judge.
This discovery dispute comes before the court upon Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order to Preclude the Taking of a Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition on Certain Topics (“motion”) and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion to Compel the United States to Identify and Produce a Rule 30(b)(6) Designee(s) on Certain Topics (“cross-motion to compel”). The parties’ dispute concerns eleven of a total of twenty-one topics contained in plaintiffs’ notice of deposition of the United States Department of Agriculture…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Iris Corp. Berhad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Zip-O-Log Mills, Inc., D/B/a, Zip-O Timber Co. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.