Legal Opinion

Aubrey Dennis Adams, Jr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert Butterworth

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 23, 1987No. 86-3207PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Part 1(A)(2), entitled “Procedural Bar,” is hereby vacated and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

2. Abuse of the Writ and Procedural Bar

A district court need not consider a claim raised for the first time in a second habeas petition, unless the petitioner establishes that the failure to raise the claim earlier was not the result of intentional abandonment or withholding or inexcusable neglect. Rule 9(b) of the Rules Govéming Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; Witt v. Wainwright, 755 F.2d 1396, 1397 (11th Cir.1985). Consideration of a claim also can be barred…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Dugger v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. James Armando Card v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Grossman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API