Legal Opinion

Central Bank & Trust Corp. v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Intervention. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. January 18, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

In the year 1907, on the application of the attorney-general of Georgia, the assets of the Neal Bank were placed in the custody of a receiver, pursuant to section 2306 of the Civil Code Prior to and at the date of the receivership, the bank was a designated depository of the State, and at the time of its failure the bank was indebted to the State in a large sum of money deposited by various State officials, which deposits appeared upon the books of the bank. By appropriate interventions the State set up the fac-t that at the time of the bank failure she had on deposit in the bank certain sums…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Broxton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Seay v. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Park v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Commonwealth v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Lamar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API