Holt v. Long
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
It is the theory of the State Tax Commission, accepted by the court below, that the word “flour,” found in subdivision j of section 4 of the Sales Tax Revenue Act of February, 1937 (Acts 1936-1937 (Ex.Sess.) p. 129), dealing with the matter of exemptions, should be construed as having reference to plain flour only, and as excluding all other brands, such as self-rising flour, pancake flour, and the like.
The bill avers and the answer admits “that flour is known by and sold to the public as plain flour, self-rising flour, pancake flour, cake flour, buckwheat flour,” and so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nettles v. LichtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- State v. PraetoriansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- O'Neal v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Long v. PoulosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Curry v. Woodstock Slag CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Camp v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- State v. Wertheimer Bag Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Hamilton v. Autauga CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.