Legal Opinion
Krasnopolsky v. Warner-Lambert Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1992No. CV 88-3723 (ADS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs claim that Arthur Krasnopolsky’s medically supervised ingestion of the drug Meclomen, an anti-inflammatory medication manufactured by the defendant Warner-Lambert Company, over a three-year period, caused him to suffer a kidney ailment known as “nephrotic syndrome”. The plaintiffs seek damages from Warner-Lambert Company on theories of negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty-
The defendant Warner-Lambert Company now moves, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment dismissing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rattner v. NetburnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,847 National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Chris M. Turtur and Stephen P. Turtur, D/B/A C & S Joint Venture, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Mario Turtur, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Yates v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- DiBartolo v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Figueroa v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.