Legal Opinion
Teledyne Continental Motors, General Products Division v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 2, 1990No. 89-1599PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Teledyne Continental Motors, General Products Division, appeals a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 89-2 B.C.A. 1121,780, 1989 WL 46978 (1989), denying-in-part, sustaining-in-part, and remanding a decision of the administrative contracting officer that Teledyne’s use of active employee head count as the sole basis for allocating pension costs between two of its divisions does not comply with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) 403 and 413. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Background
Teledyne Continental Motors manufactures tank and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- In The Matter Of Lawrence B. SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose Anselmo IglesiasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Kinetic Builder's, Inc.,appellant v. F. Whitten Peters, Secretary of the Air Force,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Delcio Rivera-Rosario v. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Mike Espy, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.