Legal Opinion

Biasi v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1928No. Appeal, 307PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an appeal by the defendant in a workman’s compensation case and the question to be determined is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the award.

Plaintiff’s husband, for whose death compensation is claimed, was a coal miner employed by defendant. There is no question but that he was poisoned by black damp in defendant’s mine on February 18, 1925, and suffered from convulsions as a result. It is admitted by appellant that poison by black damp is trauma or force according to its technical meaning under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

On April 8,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schemmel v. T. B. Gatch & Sons Contracting & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Russell v. Scott Paper Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Ripani v. DittmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Davis v. Welsbach Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API