Legal Opinion

United States v. DeLello

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 4, 1980No. ACM S24824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

The accused was found guilty by a special court-martial of carnal knowledge and adultery in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934.

Appellate defense counsel contend that the military judge erred to the substantial prejudice of the accused when he instructed the members that evidence of the accused’s uncharged misconduct could be considered for the limited purpose of impeaching his credibility.

*778The only element of the offenses in dispute was whether the accused had sexual intercourse with a 13 year old dependent of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. GaiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. RobertsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PurdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. SuttonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API