Legal Opinion

Daniel R. Gray, D.B.A. Daffy Dan's v. Daffy Dan's Bargaintown

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 2, 1987No. Appeal 86-1508PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

Daniel R. Gray appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in Concurrent Use No. 571, granting summary judgment in favor of the senior party and prior user, Daffy Dan’s Bargaintown (DDB). Gray, the junior party and later user, seeks a concurrent use registration for substantially the identical mark for identical and closely related services. Gray admits, however, that he is using the mark in DDB’s trading area. Because of the likelihood of confusion arising from this overlapping use, the board held that Gray…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Weiner King, Inc. v. Wiener King Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Application of Beatrice Foods Co. Application of Fairway Foods, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Action Temporary Services, Inc. v. Labor Force, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. VMG Enterprises, Inc. v. F. Quesada & Franco, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
  4. Ultracashmere House, Ltd. v. Springs Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Action Temporary Services, Inc. v. Labor Force, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API