Legal Opinion
Alonzo v. New Mexico Employment Security Department
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1984No. 14942Published
1Opinion of the Court
689 P.2d 286 (1984)
101 N.M. 770
Mary Seeley ALONZO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and Baldridge Lumber Company, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 14942.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
October 12, 1984.
Chris Coppin, Albuquerque, for petitioner-appellant.
Richard Baumgartner, Albuquerque, for respondents-appellees.
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant Mary Seeley Alonzo (Alonzo) was terminated from her employment for the alleged misconduct of refusing to wear a smock in compliance with a company rule. The Employment Security Department (ESD) denied Alonzo…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Coleman v. Department of LaborSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Avery v. B & B RENTAL TOILETSIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Boughton v. Division of Unemployment Insurance of Department of LaborSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.