Legal Opinion

Parker v. Hutchinson Motor Car Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1929No. 28,508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages sustained by him in the purchase of an Essex automobile from the defendant Watkins. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants on their demurrer to the evidence of the plaintiff, who appeals. There is no issue between the plaintiff and the Hutchinson Motor Company.

Was the evidence of the plaintiff sufficient to compel its submission to the triers of fact? The evidence of the plaintiff established that Ed. M. Watkins was a local representative of the Essex automobile *766at Sublette;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Kaull v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Diebold Safe & Lock Co. v. Huston & BreedingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Topeka Mill & Elevator Co. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. Harmon v. CoonrodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API