Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

CLARK v. EXPERIAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00792Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOY LUCRETIA CLARK, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-0792 : EXPERIAN, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. May 16, 2025 Plaintiff Joy Lucretia Clark initiated this civil action by filing a pro se Complaint against Experian and TransUnion.1 She claims that Experian maintained an inaccurate credit report and failed to correct inaccuracies. She also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Clark leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Sandra Cortez v. Trans UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Edward Seamans v. Temple UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API