Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1887No. 12,091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was, in the first instance, an action by Abigail E. Ross against William H. Morrison upon a contract resulting in the exchange of certain real estate.

The complaint charged that Morrison and Johnson H. Ross entered into a contract in writing, on the 6th day of January, 1877, by which it was agreed that Ross was to convey to Morrison by warranty deed certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, free from all encumbrances, except a mortgage of $30,000 which rested upon it, and that Morrison was to convey to Ross by warranty deed certain other real estate in the same city, free from all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Ludlow v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Morrison v. FishelIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Beckner v. Riverside & Battle Ground Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Gordon v. CulbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kist v. CoughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Earhart v. Farmers' CreameryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hines v. Consolidated Coal & Lime Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. First Nat. Bank of Milltown v. SchraderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API