Legal Opinion

Hines v. Consolidated Coal & Lime Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1902No. 3,528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom Hamilton Circuit Court; J. F. Neal, Judge. Action by tbe Consolidated Coal & Lime Company against William R. Hines and others on an account for material furnished subcontractors for the improvement of a street. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The city of Hoblesville, in accordance with the statute relating to the improvement of streets at the expense of the owners of adjoining lots, the city to pay for street and alley crossings, contracted with James W. Wilding and William E. Hines, composing the firm of Wilding & Co., for the improvement by them of a certain street of that city. A bond was executed by Wilding and Hines as principals, and David A. Coulter, Eobert McClamrock, and Albert E. Tucker as sureties. Wilding & Co. employed Eicklin & Co. to construct the sidewalks, the subcontractors to furnish the materials and to provide…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Brown v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Moore v. HarmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Norwood v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Fulghum & Union Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Indianapolis Mortar & Fuel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Pooley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API