Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Herron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1920No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest (Howard), J. Bill by Christopher Wilhelm against Richard C. Herron and another to quiet title to land and to enjoin a trespass thereon. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff seeks by this bill to quiet title to a strip of land 42 feet wide at the north end, 31 feet wide at the south end, and 1,963.5 feet long, situated on the west half of the southeast quarter of section 3 of Lansing township, Ingham county, and to restrain defendant from taking gravel therefrom or trespassing thereon. Sufficient facts are stated in the bill to sustain it as a bill to quiet title and to afford the other relief as incidental thereto. Defendant and his wife as tenants by the entirety hold the record *341title to the disputed strip and own land to the east thereof. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Phelps v. BrevoortMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Parsons v. BillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kushler v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sandoval County Board of Education v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In Re MacOmb Occupational Health Care, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Robertson v. BoylanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API