Fell v. Carlin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Paul Fell appeals the final judgment entered against him in a personal injury action. Fell was a back-seat pas senger in a Chevrolet Blazer involved in a rear-end collision in which the defendants, Nancy and Kenneth Carlin, admitted fault. On appeal, Fell contends the trial court should have directed a verdict in his favor on the issue of whether he sustained an injury caused by the accident. 1 After a thorough review of the record, we conclude the trial court properly denied Fell’s motion for a directed verdict. Accordingly, we affirm.
The standard of review on appeal of a trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Sims v. CristinzioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Weygant v. Fort Myers Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Singer v. BorbuaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Plana v. SainzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jackson Hewitt, Inc. v. KamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Crusselle v. MongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Geico General Insurance Co. v. HoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hernandez v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Kevan Boyles v. A&G Concrete Pools Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.