Legal Opinion

Fell v. Carlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 2009No. 2D07-2921PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Paul Fell appeals the final judgment entered against him in a personal injury action. Fell was a back-seat pas senger in a Chevrolet Blazer involved in a rear-end collision in which the defendants, Nancy and Kenneth Carlin, admitted fault. On appeal, Fell contends the trial court should have directed a verdict in his favor on the issue of whether he sustained an injury caused by the accident. 1 After a thorough review of the record, we conclude the trial court properly denied Fell’s motion for a directed verdict. Accordingly, we affirm.

The standard of review on appeal of a trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Sims v. CristinzioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Weygant v. Fort Myers Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. Singer v. BorbuaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Plana v. SainzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. v. KamanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Crusselle v. MongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Geico General Insurance Co. v. HoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Hernandez v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Kevan Boyles v. A&G Concrete Pools Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API