Legal Opinion
Reliance Shoe Co. v. Manly
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 25, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSoper, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Irving W. Eichengreen and Sigmund M. Adler, as individuals and as copartners trading as Eichengreen & Co., were adjudicated bankrupts on July 17, 1926, and receivers were appointed to take charge of their assets. The copartners (hereinafter called the dealers) had been engaged in the wholesale and retail shoe business, with stores in Baltimore, Md., and York, Pa. On July 23, 1926, the Reliance Shoe Company (hereinafter called the manufacturer), filed a petition in the bankruptcy case praying for an order directing the receivers to deliver to it 3,639 pairs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- In re GaltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Chesapeake Shoe Co. v. SeldnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marrinan Medical Supply, Inc. v. Ft. Dodge Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Reliance Shoe Co. v. ManlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Dryden v. Michigan State IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Lexington Appliance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.