Legal Opinion
Reliance Shoe Co. v. Manly
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1928No. 2647PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
This is an appeal by the Reliance Shoe Company from a decree refusing to permit it to reclaim certain shoes in the possession of the trustee in bankruptcy of Eiehengreen & Adler, bankrupts. The opinion of the District Court is reported in 18 F.(2d) 101. The entire contract between Eiehengreen & Co., and the Reliance Shoe Company and the contract on the part of Reliance Shoe Company with Eiehengreen & Go. not to record the contract between the parties are set out in full in that opinion. The appellant contends that the contract, properly construed, is one of consignment,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- In re GaltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Reliance Shoe Co. v. ManlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hervey v. AMF Beaird, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Samson Tire & Rubber Co. v. EgglestonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
- Edgewood Shoe Factories, Division of General Shoe Corp. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Shafford v. Otto Sales Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Osborn v. Ketcham & Rothschild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.