State v. Payton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtPaul E. Danielson, Associate Justice
| jAppellant State of Arkansas appeals from the order of the Searcy County Circuit Court granting a motion to suppress by appellee Mark E. Payton. The State’s sole contention on appeal is that the circuit court erred in granting the motion on the basis that Payton’s rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), were violated. We dismiss the appeal.
Payton was charged with sexual assault in the fourth degree and moved to suppress a statement that he had given, asserting that he had not been advised of his Miranda rights prior to being interviewed.1 At the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- State v. PaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015