Sibley v. Fitch
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HALE, Justice.
Appellee sued appellant'in the District Court of Hamilton County 'for the c'onversion in that county of 2400 feet of 5½.⅛⅛ oil well casing.. He prayed that he have judgment for the return of the casing, or, in the alternative, for its ■ value. Trial without a jury resulted in judgment against appellant for the value of the casing in the sum of $5400.00. :
Under the single, point'upon which his appeal is predicated, appellant says the court below erred in rendering a money judgment against him because the evidence showed that the casing involved in the suit was in his possession…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Saint Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McKinseyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Kolp v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- King v. Boerne State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Copeland v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Winkle Chevy-Olds-Pontiac, Inc. v. Condon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- First National Bank of Missouri City v. GittelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Kroger Food Company v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Major Appliance Company, Inc. v. Gibson Refrigerator Sales Corporation and Hupp Corporation, Hupp Corporation v. Major Appliance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Southwind Aviation, Inc. v. Avendano, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.