Legal Opinion
First National Bank of Missouri City v. Gittelman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 29, 1990No. C14-88-1059-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This controversy concerns appellant’s disposition of some of the collateral for a loan. Following a bench trial, the court awarded actual and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees to appellees. The judg ment is affirmed as modified but is remanded for entry of postjudgment interest.
In February 1987 Mrs. Gittelman and First National Bank of Missouri City combined several loans into one balloon note with monthly payments. The note was secured in part by a 1982 Mazda. The car was actually in the possession of appellee, Lisa Fike, Mrs. Gittelman’s daughter, who was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Davis v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Mead v. Johnson Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Childress v. CurrieTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Hasty Inc. v. Inwood Buckhorn Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Kenneth Leventhal & Co. v. Reeves, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Taiwan Shrimp Farm Village Ass'n v. U.S.A. Shrimp Farm Development, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.