Legal Opinion

Garrado v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1955No. Civ. 21135PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Defendants Pauline Collins and Wilburn Adams appeal from a declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff Roy Lee Garrado, who in turn moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that appellants are not aggrieved by the judgment. We do not reach a decision upon the merits of appellants’ contentions because it appears that the motion to dismiss is well taken.

Pauline Collins is administratrix of the estate of Estella Mae Garrado, deceased. She is sued individually and as such administratrix. She and her codefendant are children of decedent and one Paul Adams to whom decedent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Estate of KroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Brown v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Nicholas v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Niles v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Estate of LeslieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Aubrey v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  4. Security Pacific National Bank v. MatekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API