Legal Opinion
Judy Breitman v. May Company California, a Division of the May Department Stores Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1994No. 92-55845PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:'
Appellant Judy Breitman raises two issues in this appeal. First, Breitman challenges the district court’s denial of her motion to remand to state court on the basis that the court improperly determined that jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship was proper in California. Second, Breitman challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to May Company on her breach of contract and age discrimination claims.
This action was brought in state court and removed on the grounds of diversity of citizenship. Breitman challenges the jurisdiction of the district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Mark Schwartz v. Electronic Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Kathy Kroske, an Individual v. Us Bank Corp., a Foreign Corporation Dba U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- L'Garde, Inc. v. Raytheon Space & Airborne SystemsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Strother v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Next Step Medical Co. v. Johnson & Johnson InternationalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.