Legal Opinion

Rehberg v. Paulk

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 11, 2010No. 09-11897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

In this § 1983 action, Plaintiff Charles Rehberg sued former District Attorney Kenneth Hodges, specially appointed prosecutor Kelly Burke, and Chief Investigator James Paulk, alleging federal claims for malicious prosecution, retaliatory investigation and prosecution, evidence fabrication, and conspiracy to violate Rehberg’s constitutional rights. Defendants Hodges, Burke, and Paulk, in their individual capacities, appeal the district court’s denial of absolute and qualified immunities. After review and oral argument, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tesone v. Empire Marketing StrategiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Rehberg v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Lavassani v. City of Canton, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
  4. Rehberg v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Signature Pharmacy, Inc. v. SoaresDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API