Legal Opinion
State v. Cialkowski
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1975No. 39691PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
Defendant was charged with contributing to the delinquency of two minor girls. He persuaded them to enter a dancing contest in a place akin to a roadhouse and during the dances to bare breasts and/or buttocks. Following conviction, a motion for new trial was sustained and the case dismissed on the ground that the statutes violated were void because they were vague and indefinite. We reverse the judgment of the District Court.
Section 28-477, R. S. Supp., 1974, provides: “Any person who by any act, encourages, causes, or contributes to the delinquency, neglect, or need for special supervision,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- People v. BergersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Casselman v. MacKenNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Interest of RJNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Edward M. Cialkowski v. Darrell Franzen, Sheriff of Platte County, NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. CialkowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1975