Graddy v. Hightower
Supreme Court of Georgia
This was a rule for new trial, made absolute by Judge Warren, in the Superior Court of the county ofDooly, at May Term, 1846. In the granting of which new trial, the error complained of by the plaintiff in error was assigned. The circumstances of the case, the decision of the court below, and the grounds of error alleged, are set forth in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court, to which the reader is referred.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
Nisbet, Judge.
Upon the trial of this cause in the court below, a decree was had in favor of the complainant. At the term when the decree was rendered, a motion was made by defendant’s solicitors, orally, for a rule nisi for a new trial. What was claimed by the mover of this rule as a brief of the testimony in the case, was presented to the judge. This brief was objected to by complainant’s counsel as imperfect; indeed, a protest against its completeness was formally made by them. There was, therefore, no brief of testimony, either agreed upon by the parties or approved by the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Coggeshall v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Llewellyn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Scarbrough v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.