Legal Opinion

Rieker v. City of Danville

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. S. Murray Clark, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The appellee, the city of Danville, filed in the county court of Vermilion county its petition under the act concerning local improvements, in force July 1, 1897, (Hurd’s Stat. 1899, p. 862,) for the appointment of two commissioners to act with the president of the board of local improvements in fixing the ' compensation for private property to be taken for opening and extending a street and to assess benefits resulting therefrom. The commissioners were appointed and their compensation was fixed as provided by the act, and they reported that the appellant John Rieker, an insane person, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Epling v. DicksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sanitary District of Chicago v. BernsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Smith v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. City of Chicago v. HaywardIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Lincoln Park v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trust Co. v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Village of Palatine v. DahleIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Chicago v. Sullivan Machinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Harvard v. McCauleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API