Sage Systems v. Michael Liss
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 75 Sage Systems, Inc., Respondent, v. Michael Liss, &c., Appellant. Christopher A. Raimondi, for appellant. Fred L. Seeman, for respondent. RIVERA, J.: Under the American Rule, a prevailing party in litigation generally may not recover attorney’s fees from the losing party (see Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers,
74 NY2d 487, 491
[1989]). Plaintiff claims that defendant waived the benefit of this rule by agreeing to a broad indemnification provision in their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ambac Assur. Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Breed, Abbott & Morgan v. HulkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.