Legal Opinion

Breed, Abbott & Morgan v. Hulko

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1989PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The narrow question before us is whether, under the circumstances presented, defendant agreed to indemnify plaintiff for its legal expenses incurred resisting defendant’s claims (see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, 5). We conclude that defendant did so agree, for the reason stated in the opinion of the late Justice Leonard H. Sandler that if this agreement did not include plaintiff law firm’s "legal expenses incurred in defending against an action by one of the parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Breed, Abbott & Morgan v. HulkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Promuto v. Waste Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Perchinsky v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. DiPerna v. American Broadcasting CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Pfizer, Inc. v. Stryker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API