Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Treasurer & Receiver General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The question in this case is whether the trust estate is liable to a succession tax under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 527, § 8, or of St. 1907, c. 563, codified as St. 1909, c. 490, Part IV. The Probate Court held that it was liable to such tax under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 527, § 8, and entered a decree accordingly. The petitioner appealed. The case was reserved by a single justice for this court “upon the pleadings, decree, claim of appeal therefrom, and objections thereto, and agreed statement of facts.” ‘

We think that the decree of the Probate Court was right and should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Chanler v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Orr v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of DowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Attorney General v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saltonstall v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Magee v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Clarke v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Coolidge v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Dexter v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API